Identically adopts ISO 19130-1:2018 which identifies information required to determine the relationship between the position of a remotely sensed pixel in image coordinates and its geoposition. Supports exploitation of remotely sensed images. Defines metadata to be distributed with the image to enable user determination of geographic position from the observations.
Table of contents
Header
About this publication
Preface
Foreword
Introduction
1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms
5 Conformance
6 Notation
7 Image geopositioning: Overview and common elements
7.1 General
7.2 Type of geopositioning information
7.3 Calibration data
7.3.1 General
7.3.2 Geometric calibration
7.3.3 Radiometric calibration
7.4 Ground control points
7.4.1 General
7.4.2 Control point types
7.4.3 Control point schema
8 Physical Sensor Models
8.1 Sensor types
8.1.1 General
8.1.2 Frame sensor
8.1.3 Pushbroom sensor
8.1.4 Whiskbroom sensor
8.1.5 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
8.2 Physical Sensor Model approach
8.2.1 Physical Sensor Model introduction
8.2.2 Physical Sensor Model parameters
8.2.3 Interior sensor parameters
8.2.4 Exterior sensor/platform parameters
8.2.5 Ground-to-image function
8.2.6 Image-to-ground function
8.2.7 Error propagation
8.2.8 Adjustable model parameters
8.3 Quality associated with Physical Sensor Models
8.4 Physical Sensor Model metadata
8.4.1 General
8.4.2 Overview of the Physical Sensor Model schema
8.5 Location and orientation
8.5.1 Overview
8.5.2 Position
8.5.3 Attitude
8.5.4 Dynamics
8.5.5 Position and orientation of a sensor relative to the platform
8.6 Sensor parameters
8.6.1 SD_SensorParameters
8.6.2 Detector array
8.6.3 Sensor system and operation
8.6.4 SD_OpticsOperation
8.6.5 Distortion correction
8.6.6 Microwave sensors
9 True Replacement Models and Correspondence Models
9.1 Functional fitting
9.2 True Replacement Model approach
9.2.1 General
9.2.2 Types of True Replacement Models
9.2.2.1 Polynomials
9.2.2.2 Coordinate normalization
9.2.2.3 Direct Linear Transform
9.2.2.4 True Replacement Model based on grid interpolation
9.2.2.5 Ground-to-image and image-to-ground transformations
9.2.2.6 Rigorous error propagation with a True Replacement Model
9.2.2.7 Adjustability for True Replacement Model
9.2.2.8 Summary
9.3 Quality associated with a True Replacement Model
9.4 Schema for True Replacement Model
9.5 Correspondence Model approach
9.5.1 General
9.5.2 Limitations of Correspondence Models
9.5.3 3D-to-2D Correspondence Models
9.5.4 2D-to-2D Correspondence Models
9.6 Schema for Correspondence Models
Annex A
A.1 Geopositioning information
A.2 Ground control points
A.2.1 GCP collection
A.2.2 GCP repository
A.3 Physical Sensor Model
A.3.1 Sensor model completeness
A.3.2 Platform information
A.3.3 Sensor information
A.3.4 Optics
A.3.5 SAR
A.4 Functional fitting
A.5 True Replacement Model
A.6 Correspondence Model
Annex B
B.1 Data dictionary overview
B.1.1 General
B.1.2 Data type/class
B.1.3 Obligation/Condition
B.1.4 Domain
B.2 UML models for geolocation information
B.2.1 Physical Sensor Model
B.2.2 True replacement and correspondence models
B.2.3 Codelists
Annex C
C.1 Introduction
C.1.1 Overview
C.1.2 Earth coordinates
C.1.3 Sensor coordinates
C.2 Platform position with respect to the Earth
C.2.1 General
C.2.2 Geodetic coordinate reference system
C.2.2.1 Discussion
C.2.2.2 Global geodetic coordinate reference systems
C.2.2.3 Topocentric coordinate system
C.2.2.4 Platform coordinate reference systems
C.2.2.4.1 Basic platform CRS
C.2.2.4.2 Platform CRS corrected for attitude
C.2.2.4.3 Platform CRS corrected for attitude and heading
C.2.2.4.4 Satellite platform coordinate reference system
C.2.2.5 Platform position extensions for satellite implementation
